Constrained Writing

“What is written without effort is generally read without pleasure.” –Samuel Johnson

I find writing a coherent sentence is a fun but challenging endeavor—even on days when words are flowing freely. However, I have recently discovered that some authors go out of their way to make the writing process more difficult. I am talking about constrained writing. This is a technique in which the writer, bound by certain conditions, is forbidden from using certain things. I can only imagine the amount of effort that the authors expended in order to accomplish their goal. Here are a few examples:

Gadsby by Ernest Vincent Wright is a 50,100 word novel written without using the letter, “e.”

The French novel La Disparition, by George Perec also does not include the letter “e.” Perec’s novella, Les Revenentes, on the other hand, uses no other vowel except for “e.”

Another French novel, Le Train de Bulle Part by Michael Thaler was written without verbs.

In Never Again by Doug Nufer no word is used more than once.

In Alphabetical Africa by Walter Abish, the first chapter only uses words that begin with the letter “a,” while the second chapter incorporates the letter “b,” and then “c,” etc. Once the alphabet is finished, Abish takes letters away, one at a time, until the last chapter, leaving only words that begin with the letter “a.”

Green Eggs and Ham by Dr. Seuss (Therdor Geisel) uses only 50 different words. According an article I read, Geisel did this on a $50 bet with Bennet Cerf.

For more information on this genre, visit Absolute Astronomy.com.

It’s embarrassing to admit that I have not read any of these books other than Green Eggs and Ham. However, next time I’m in the library, I hope to find at least one of these examples. I’m curious to know how readable they are.

Have you read or written anything using the constrained writing technique?

Thanks for stopping by.

Tags: Samuel Johnson, constrained writing, Gadsby, Dr. Seuss, Geisel, Cerf, Nufer, Abish, Perec, Thaler,

Rejection Letters

“No rejection is fatal until the writer walks away from the battle leaving dreams and goals behind.” - Jeff Herman

I don’t know of any writer that has not received a number of rejections before finding a publisher for their manuscript. I received plenty of rejections before finding a home for The Ride with ArcheBooks. Sometimes the ‘reject’ was a form letter, sometimes a short hand written note and many times receiving nothing at all was my only clue that my submission had not been accepted.

It’s hard not to take rejection personally but as an author it’s important to develop a thick hide. Otherwise, you may become so discouraged that you quit submitting. Though disappointed by my rejections, it helped me to remember I was not alone.
.
Rudyard Kipling received the following note from the editor of the San Francisco Examiner: “I’m sorry, Mr. Kipling, but you just don’t know how to use the English language.”

The Time Machine author H.G. Wells, was told, “It is not interesting enough for the general reader and not thorough enough for the scientific reader.”

Dr. Seuss was told, “…too different from other juveniles on the market to warrant its selling.”

George Orwell was told, “It is impossible to sell animal stories in the U.S.A.”

One of Mary Higgins Clark’s rejections for Journey Back to Love stated, “We found the heroine as boring as her husband had.”

One rejection of Carrie that Stephen King received said, “We are not interested in science fiction which deals with negative utopias. They do not sell.”

Each of these authors had the last laugh.

How do you handle rejection letters?

Thanks for stopping by.

Tags: The Ride, ArcheBooks, Jeff Herman, Kipling, H. G. Wells, Dr. Seuss, Orwell, Mary Higgins Clark, Stephen King, rejections,